Accurate hourly values of Global Horizontal Irradiance: not easy to find!

Global Horizontal Irradiance is the shortwave solar radiation that can be converted to electrical current by photo voltaic panels. There are many factors affecting GHI: your location on earth, the season and time of day, cloud formations and other atmospheric conditions.
Mathematical models have gotten pretty good at predicting daily and monthly GHI based on satellite images and temperature or humidity measurements. Estimating hourly values seems a lot harder, with most models having a 25% error margin.
The Canadian Weather Energy Engineering Dataset (CWEEDS), published by the federal government's department for Environment and Climate Change Canada, provides hourly GHI values for dozens of locations in each province. But when you read the release notes, you find that most hourly values are derived from a model and have not been directly observed:

Solar global horizontal irradiance (field 102) observations are available for some of the period of record for 35 of the 143 CWEEDS locations. The MAC3 model was used to estimate solar global horizontal irradiance for the 108 locations and times for which observations were unavailable. It is important to note that the modelling errors can be substantial for any given hour. The root-mean-square error for hourly solar global horizontal irradiance amounts are typically around 30% (Morris and Skinner, 1990).

Which locations in the dataset have measured GHI values, and what is the portion of measured versus estimated (modeled) values? I looked at the data for the province of Alberta, and calculated the percentage of observed, missing and derived hourly values:

        X  Value was observed (that is, not derived with a model and not altered)
E Value was missing and has been replaced by a hand estimate.
I Value was missing and has been replaced with one derived by
interpolation from neighboring observations.
M Value was missing and has been replaced with one derived
with a model (model used depends on element).
Q Value is derived from other values (e.g. illuminance data which are not observed).
9 Value is missing; data positions contain 9s as well
Hourly sample origin percentages for Alberta CWEEDS data

Only Stony Plain and the Edmonton municipal airport had actual measurements of Global Horizontal Irradiance. At the municipal airport, 17.5% of all observations between 1953 and 2004 were based on measured values, whereas Stony Plain measured 81.0% of all hourly GHI values.

If you need hourly GHI values to validate a photo voltaic model, it is probably wiser to use the data from the Stony Plain location, rather than a location nearer you.

Environment Canada published a Solar radiation data and model review in 2010, recommending an update of the CWEEDS data for the benefit of the solar industry. The automation of most observation stations caused cloud observation data to be incompatible with the models for estimating GHI, so more measurements (or re-staffing observation stations) will be required.

Le me know if you are interested in the data for your province.

You may also like

  • Finished1 Long- and short range passive infrared surveillance system
  • Evaluating BeagleBone Green with a simple temperature alarm project.
  • Updating with solar output from eGauge
  • Global Horizontal Irradiance data for Canada

Add a comment

Comments can be formatted using a simple wiki syntax.